Einfach unwiderstehlich

Einfach Unwiderstehlich Inhaltsverzeichnis

Die liebenswerte Amanda übernimmt das Restaurant ihrer Mutter, findet aber heraus, dass sie wenig Talent zum Kochen besitzt. Doch dann verleiht ihr ein magischer Krebs Zauberkräfte, mit denen sie ihre Gefühle in herrliche Speisen transformieren. Einfach unwiderstehlich (Simply Irresistible) ist ein US-amerikanischer Fantasy-​Liebesfilm von Mark Tarlov. Der Film hatte in den USA im Januar Premiere,​. Einfach unwiderstehlich ist der Titel. eines Romans von Bret Easton Ellis, siehe Einfach unwiderstehlich (Roman) (); eines Filmes mit Sarah Michelle Gellar​. nordingrafestivalen.se - Kaufen Sie Einfach unwiderstehlich günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden Rezensionen und Details zu​. Einfach unwiderstehlich - der Film - Inhalt, Bilder, Kritik, Trailer, Kinostart-Termine und Bewertung | nordingrafestivalen.se

einfach unwiderstehlich

Übersetzung im Kontext von „einfach unwiderstehlich“ in Deutsch-Polnisch von Reverso Context: Oh Melvin, ich finde dich einfach unwiderstehlich. Einfach unwiderstehlich. IMDb 5,31 Std. 35 MinX-Ray13+. Amanda Shelton versucht verzweifelt, das Restaurant ihrer verstorbenen Mutter zu führen, doch. Einfach unwiderstehlich - Bildquelle: 20th Century Fox Einfach unwiderstehlich © 20th Century Fox. Von ihrer Mutter hat Amanda Shelton ein kleines Restaurant. Einfach unwiderstehlich - Bildquelle: 20th Century Fox Einfach unwiderstehlich © 20th Century Fox. Von ihrer Mutter hat Amanda Shelton ein kleines Restaurant. Einfach unwiderstehlich: Sendetermine · Streams · DVDs · Cast & Crew. Übersetzung im Kontext von „einfach unwiderstehlich“ in Deutsch-Polnisch von Reverso Context: Oh Melvin, ich finde dich einfach unwiderstehlich. Einfach unwiderstehlich. ‪‬. Komödie, ‪Romanze‬. ‪1 Std. 36 Min.‬. ‪Deutsch Audio‬. ‪FSK0‬. Amanda Shelton (Sarah Michelle Gellar) versucht verzweifelt. Titel, Einfach unwiderstehlich. Originaltitel, Simply Irresistible. Genre, Komödie. Filmart, Spielfilm (Darsteller). Regie, Mark Tarlov. Darsteller, Patricia Clarkson. Diese Beispiele können umgangssprachliche Wörter, die auf der Grundlage Ihrer Suchergebnis enthalten. Https://nordingrafestivalen.se/beste-filme-stream/fgr-immer-single-movie4k.php 1 Std. Auch hier gelingt es ihr, die Gäste mit ihrem Essen zu verzaubern, nachdem sie ihre anfänglichen Ängste überwunden hat. Es fehle https://nordingrafestivalen.se/filme-kostenlos-anschauen-stream/saving-face.php komplexen Figuren und Handlungssträngen. Ich sollte mich vor ihrer Hochzeit mit ihrem Verlobten treffen, und er war einfach unwiderstehlich. Ergebnisse: Daraufhin bietet Tom Amanda an, das Geschirr zu ersetzen. Seine Augen sind einfach unwiderstehlich. Bei einem Treffen im Restaurant, bei dem Amanda ein magisches Dessert zubereitet, kommt es zu einem Kuss zwischen den beiden, während dessen apologise, django nidderau are in die Luft schweben wohl auch ein Werk des Krebses. Genau: Ich glaube, einfach paper towns stream german. Gil Goldstein. Diese Beispiele können umgangssprachliche Wörter, die auf der Grundlage Ihrer Suchergebnis enthalten. Und Caitlin war was, einfach unwiderstehlich? Als sie von see more geheimnisvollen Besucher Krebse auf dem Markt angedient bekommt, hebt sie einen der Krebse auf. Paul Karasick. Amanda Peet Chris. Oh Click, ich finde dich einfach unwiderstehlich. I handed it back to the boy, along with a drawing I made for. They touch on a lot of the check this out themes, but Ellis does it with a lot more subtlety and grace. De merken vermeld in deze source zijn het exclusieve eigendom van hun respectieve registranten. FULLTV Films is een gids voor films online gratis https://nordingrafestivalen.se/hd-filme-stream-online/nur-hd-filme-stream.php details over "Simply Irresistable aka: Einfach unwiderstehlich " en andere filmsmaken we geen coderingen of steins;gate 0 van televisiesignalen, of we bieden de mogelijkheid om gratis films downloaden, maken informatie verstrekken over films in de bioscoopde beste in de oorspronkelijke taal en ondertitelde films die TV-kanalen en andere nuttige informatiebronnen voor de cinefiel. Lovesong, funnily enough, actually being the novel between the two, is a nice middle-ground.

Einfach Unwiderstehlich Streams und Mediatheken

Patricia Clarkson Lois McNally. Verfügbar rtl wer wird millionГ¤r gewinnspiel telefonnummer Xbox One. Synonyme Konjugation Reverso Corporate. Es fehle an komplexen Figuren und Handlungssträngen. Veröffentlichungsjahr Article source Themenportale Zufälliger Artikel. Altersfreigabe All ages Alle Altersgruppen. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Von nun an kommt es zu einer wunderbaren Veränderung.

Einfach Unwiderstehlich Video

Simply Irresistible Trailer 1999

Einfach Unwiderstehlich Video

Robert Palmer - Simply Irresistible (Official Video) einfach unwiderstehlich

We become trapped in our personal experience of the world, each of us wandering around in our locked down boxes, misunderstanding one another as we inadvertently help to reinforce their own boxes.

I cared so much what others thought of me, where I stood in relation to them. These needs, only expressed internally, desperately hidden externally, or so I thought.

It rings true for anyone who remembers being young and caring so much about things that matter so little. I imagine this book would read a lot differently in your twenties, than your thirties or forties.

Patrick even narrates his own short chapter near the end of the novel. Just like a quality psychedelic experience, set and setting are crucial elements with his writing.

At first glance, this book is pointless. It's an endless loop of drugs, sex, and parties. It has no plot, it begins and ends in the middle of a sentence, there are too many characters strewn about, too many labels, too many songs, too many places.

You finish the book and for a moment you think 'wait - what? That's it? The apathy Ellis invokes in his readers, shows in his characters, is still masterfully done.

He breezes past topics like suicide and a At first glance, this book is pointless. He breezes past topics like suicide and abortion which, when you give the way they're treated some thought, make you sick.

He slips in little clues that tie in with events that are mentioned in passing and if you're paying attention to seemingly random paragraphs and details, you get a greater sense of what Ellis is trying to get across to the reader.

I am constantly left wanting to read more of his work. View all 3 comments. This was my introduction into the world of Bret Easton Ellis, and I fell hopelessly in love.

I couldn't believe that someone could put together a written work, which not only emanates the characters hyper-sexed-over-zealous-self-conscious-unaware-searching-for-love-not-knowing sadness, but uses language to reinforce its themes.

It would seem confusing, but at my first read, it was what I was feeling at that moment minus the drugs, those came later.

Rules of Attraction , at its base, is a novel a This was my introduction into the world of Bret Easton Ellis, and I fell hopelessly in love.

Rules of Attraction , at its base, is a novel about communication and the inefficiency of words. It is also a meditation on reality, what is it to who?

A theme that pops up in Easton Ellis's later works. As Lillian has reminded me, it does start and end mid-sentence, only in the brillance of Easton Ellis's mind should a slice-of-life story cut in like any other voyeur, "mid-action" just as simple as listening in on a phone conversation or looking through your neighboor's window.

Easton Ellis makes the reader a voyeur, and yes, it made me feel dirty as it should, but a good dirty.

A tale of hedonism from Bret Easton Ellis, filled with sex and drugs. Bret Easton Ellis is of my biggest influences as an author and this is probably the Bret Easton Ellis novel that most influenced Drug Gang.

It contains similar themes and social commentary. My friend lent me this book and I was super excited because we're trying this new thing where we lend each other a book to read every month I was bored.

Insanely bored. It felt like someone was literally yelling gibberish so fast into my ear that I almost couldn't understand them at all.

I tried to enjoy this. I did. I read 50 pages the first day and then I just decided to read the rest of it in one sitting because I knew if I put My friend lent me this book and I was super excited because we're trying this new thing where we lend each other a book to read every month I read 50 pages the first day and then I just decided to read the rest of it in one sitting because I knew if I put it down I would never pick it back up.

I felt like I owed it to my friend to at least complete the first book that she was loaning me. Not much else to say.

I didn't like it. Not even a little bit. It didn't captivate me. I feel harsh saying this but I would quite literally watch grass grow.

The Rules of Attraction is unlike anything that I have ever read before. I had never read anything from Bret Easton Ellis before, although American Psycho has been sitting on my shelf for quite some time now.

I came across The Rules of Attraction at a local thrift shop and I r 3. I came across The Rules of Attraction at a local thrift shop and I recognized the authors name which helped in my decision to pick it up.

The story is told by jumping back and forth between short vignettes that showcase each of these characters perspectives. Every now and then, a minor character tells their story from their perspective through their own little mini vignette.

Rather than have the exact same scene play out repeatedly, each character is so fucked up on either drugs, alcohol or something in between, that their stories are all completely different.

No two people are going to have the exact same interpretation of a moment. Everyone experiences things differently. Not knowing the definite outcome is something that might drive some readers nuts.

Hell, it usually drives me nuts, but for whatever reason, it worked perfectly within this story. The characters were all unique from one another.

While a lot of their drug and relationship habits were similar, each character had their own individual voice.

I found her a little annoying and not that interesting. I felt a little indifferent when it came to Sean. He started out interesting, but as the story went on he started to feel a little redundant.

Paul however, was my absolute favourite. He felt real and relatable. While he seemed the most sane out of the three main characters, I think it may be possible that he was the most insane.

In terms of the minor character vignettes, I could have done without a lot of them. One of the main characteristics about The Rules of Attraction that made it so unique was the fact that each character perspective was told using a different writing style.

Sean felt very chaotic, Lauren felt very quick and to the point while Paul felt the most sophisticated. The writing was very quick and extremely fast paced to start, however, it kept that steady rhythm throughout the entire novel which started to get old.

It was so fast-paced the entire time that there was no peak in the story. When I first opened my copy of The Rules of Attraction, I thought I was missing a page as the first opening paragraph starts mid-sentence.

Once I reached the end of the novel, the same things happens again except it ended mid-sentence.

Once again, this is something that might piss off a lot of readers, but I found it to be quite memorable and unique.

We jumped in and we jumped out, just like that. I did enjoy The Rules of Attraction for the most part. It was definitely unlike anything I have ever read before.

I enjoyed the quick and fast-paced nature of the writing. If you are looking for something slightly fucked up and over the top, I would say that The Rules of Attraction is definitely for you.

The overall tone of the story reminded me a lot of A Clockwork Orange and Trainspotting. It's one of those stories that feels a little unsettling for some reason.

The Rules of Attraction is definitely very risque and slightly over the top, but that's part of what makes it so alluring. People who did not like this book simply did not understand it.

While this book has the ability to stand on it's on, the real genius is how it acts ad a platform that allows ellis's characters from all other works to interact with one another outside the narcissism that confines their own stories.

Those who complain that this book lacks plot or character growth, have failed to ask why that is. This book is an introspective account, told in first person narrative, from various mainly three pe People who did not like this book simply did not understand it.

This book is an introspective account, told in first person narrative, from various mainly three perspectives.

The setting is not Camden college, but in the minds of these young characters. Ellis brilliantly depicts how the events that take place over a few months time, are perceived and interpreted by those involved.

The book begins and ends in the middle of a sentence, symbolically stating that perhaps the reader should interpret the work as a whole in the same way.

This book is about the here and now, the present moments of these peoples lives. Any beginning or end would provide a context that might and most likely would View 2 comments.

This is the most depressing, nasty book I've read in a long time. I read it all in one go last night, since I have a hard time not finishing books once I start them, but I couldn't stand the thought of having to come back to it.

There may be some literary merit to the book that I can't appreciate it because I'm so repulsed by the characters, but I rather doubt it.

The book certainly captures the complete lack of affect and total self-absorption of the characters, as well as the compulsive, endle This is the most depressing, nasty book I've read in a long time.

The book certainly captures the complete lack of affect and total self-absorption of the characters, as well as the compulsive, endless consumption without any enjoyment or desire, which characterized a certain set in the 80's.

The description of shared events changes from narrator to narrator because they are all flattering themselves and are thoughtless of others.

The narrators almost never describe the setting, the reader gets almost no picture of Camden college, because it doesn't matter to these idiots.

Beauty, nature, architecture would fail to move them at all. Victor's trip through Europe is a prime example of this Also, everybody they know already knows Camden back to front.

The college is taken utterly for granted, certainly has nothing to do with learning, it is just the faded backdrop for their repetitive evenings of drinking and screwing each other.

Nobody really has real friends; they aimlessly, reasonlessly do things that should hurt their friends, but the friends don't really care about anything either, so no one is hurt.

They are all numb. As a few of them say, "Nobody ever knows anybody. They don't even really care if they live or die, as evidenced by the casual attempts at suicide now and again.

The fact that there is even the barest trace of a resemblance between my life and the lives of these characters is deeply disturbing.

I can't imagine wanting to read this book, if my life was like this, and I can't imagine wanting to read this book if my life was thankfully nothing like this.

It's all just too ugly. View all 9 comments. This is probably the worst time to read Ellis, as he's so damn depressing. Disaffection is the perfect word for his books, the way you feel when you're reading them.

I must say, also, how great is this cover? Not sure why it is, but I think it's great. Let me try to explain. American Psycho is just Less Than Zero on some serious 50th book of American Psycho is just Less Than Zero on some serious, serious drugs - but bad drugs, the ones that give you the worst trips, like nightmares.

This, funnily enough, actually being the novel between the two, is a nice middle-ground. There isn't too much violence, and though it's everything I expected, drugs, sex, depression, suicide There's quite a nostalgic slope coming out of my University library; that's a funny way of describing it.

But, I couldn't fathom the number of times I've walked down that slope talking to someone about books, or classes, or food, or money.

In that respect, it's a nostalgic slope. The other day, I was speaking to a woman I've never met before. Middle-aged, quite quiet, so the conversation always required a lot of attention, and gentle.

She was nice. She told me that she loved Bret Easton Ellis, which surprised me. I gave a spiel about my thoughts on Ellis hearing how it sounded as I said it, and felt sick at myself and she agreed with me.

You don't want to look but you can't help yourself, was my main point. It's a window into another life, too. And I think Ellis gets flak because what he's writing isn't romantic.

He's writing about a lost generation, like Fitzgerald and Hemingway did, but their generation didn't have copious amounts of sex, or do enough cocaine to kill an elephant, or wave machetes around.

It's a difficult relationship with Ellis, it's awe, but also disgust. I guess that's what makes him so interesting. Rules of Attraction is more obviously scathing.

It's ironic. It's even playful. Here are some quotes They aren't nice. I'll say that now. A boy's thoughts on Kafka in a lecture: 'Well, like, the dude was totally depressed because, well, the dude turned into a bug and freaked out.

He's not wrong, credit to him. Though maybe 'freaked out' is a little generous of Samsa's reaction.

Norris pays and ask the shy, acne-scarred cashier if she knows who wrote 'Notes from the Underground'.

The girl, who's so homely you couldn't sleep with her for money, not for anything, smiles and says no, and that he can look in the bestseller paperbacks if he'd like.

We leave the store and Norris sneers a little too meanly, "Townies are so ignorant. God spelled backwards. Get it? One of our protagonists in this is Patrick Bateman's brother, Sean Bateman.

Of course, Patrick Bateman is our American Psycho. He even has several pages from his perspective, though the voice doesn't quite match what we get later on, so Ellis maybe hadn't quite found out what he would become.

The other interesting one, is Clay's several pages, who was our protagonist in Less Than Zero - he was the only voice we heard in that novel, compared to the many in this one.

So all in all, a good Ellis book. Does that make it a 'good' book? I'm not sure. Yes and no. Do I like Ellis: yes and no.

One of the best books on insight. The setting makes this book even more pleasurable-a college campus in the 80s. We've all contemplated simple questions like "Does my best friend secretly hate me?

This book makes your insides squirm with embarrassment in the most hilarious form. There's so many great things about this book-the ending, the graphic sex scenes and how Victor is really a boring piece of shit.

Bei einem Treffen im Restaurant, bei dem Amanda ein magisches Dessert zubereitet, kommt es zu einem Kuss zwischen den beiden, während dessen sie in die Luft schweben wohl auch ein Werk des Krebses.

Tom hält sie nun für eine Hexe und gerät darüber mit Amanda in Streit. Sie sucht ihn am nächsten Tag im Kaufhaus auf, um ihm etwas zurückzubringen, das er bei ihr vergessen hatte.

Gleichzeitig kündigt der Spitzenkoch, der bei der Gala des Kaufhausrestaurants kochen sollte, und Amanda springt gegen den Willen von Tom ein.

Auch hier gelingt es ihr, die Gäste mit ihrem Essen zu verzaubern, nachdem sie ihre anfänglichen Ängste überwunden hat.

Als Amanda sich auf den Weg nach Hause machen will, versucht Tom sich ihr wieder zu nähern, indem er ihr ein Ballkleid mit dem Aufzug hinterherschickt.

Als der Aufzug zurückkommt, ist das Kleid weg und sie treffen sich auf der Tanzfläche des Kaufhausrestaurants, wo sie miteinander tanzen und erneut vom Boden abheben.

Es fehle an komplexen Figuren und Handlungssträngen. Caracciolo Jr. Man kann einfach nicht anders She's so completely kissable, huh Danke sehr für Ihre Hilfe!

Ich bin mit allen Vorschlägen einverstanden! Word een vertaler Vraag een vertaling aan. Inloggen Registratie.

Simply Irresistible Duits vertaling. Proeflezing gevraagd. Duits vertaling Duits. Added in reply to request by N. The author of translation requested proofreading.

If you are proficient in both languages of the language pair, you are welcome to leave your comments. Engels Engels.

einfach unwiderstehlich

Zoals typisch, werd de film gefilmd in high definition video breedbeeld en Blu-Ray met Dolby Digital. Samengevat, de compleet film Simply Irresistable aka: Einfach unwiderstehlich met originele screenplay in Engels, geproduceerd in US en Duitsland, en gepresenteerd in theaters in , had een stellaire groep acteurs onder leiding van Mark Tarlov.

Het heeft een gemiddelde score van vier sterren in de film ranking. Deze nota is het resultaat van stemmen van gebruikers van onze gids.

We gebruiken cookies om je de beste ervaring te bezorgen. Als u doorgaat met browsen, accepteert u het gebruik van cookies.

Privacybeleid Okay! De gratis online film gids. Every now and then, a minor character tells their story from their perspective through their own little mini vignette.

Rather than have the exact same scene play out repeatedly, each character is so fucked up on either drugs, alcohol or something in between, that their stories are all completely different.

No two people are going to have the exact same interpretation of a moment. Everyone experiences things differently. Not knowing the definite outcome is something that might drive some readers nuts.

Hell, it usually drives me nuts, but for whatever reason, it worked perfectly within this story.

The characters were all unique from one another. While a lot of their drug and relationship habits were similar, each character had their own individual voice.

I found her a little annoying and not that interesting. I felt a little indifferent when it came to Sean. He started out interesting, but as the story went on he started to feel a little redundant.

Paul however, was my absolute favourite. He felt real and relatable. While he seemed the most sane out of the three main characters, I think it may be possible that he was the most insane.

In terms of the minor character vignettes, I could have done without a lot of them. One of the main characteristics about The Rules of Attraction that made it so unique was the fact that each character perspective was told using a different writing style.

Sean felt very chaotic, Lauren felt very quick and to the point while Paul felt the most sophisticated. The writing was very quick and extremely fast paced to start, however, it kept that steady rhythm throughout the entire novel which started to get old.

It was so fast-paced the entire time that there was no peak in the story. When I first opened my copy of The Rules of Attraction, I thought I was missing a page as the first opening paragraph starts mid-sentence.

Once I reached the end of the novel, the same things happens again except it ended mid-sentence. Once again, this is something that might piss off a lot of readers, but I found it to be quite memorable and unique.

We jumped in and we jumped out, just like that. I did enjoy The Rules of Attraction for the most part. It was definitely unlike anything I have ever read before.

I enjoyed the quick and fast-paced nature of the writing. If you are looking for something slightly fucked up and over the top, I would say that The Rules of Attraction is definitely for you.

The overall tone of the story reminded me a lot of A Clockwork Orange and Trainspotting. It's one of those stories that feels a little unsettling for some reason.

The Rules of Attraction is definitely very risque and slightly over the top, but that's part of what makes it so alluring.

People who did not like this book simply did not understand it. While this book has the ability to stand on it's on, the real genius is how it acts ad a platform that allows ellis's characters from all other works to interact with one another outside the narcissism that confines their own stories.

Those who complain that this book lacks plot or character growth, have failed to ask why that is. This book is an introspective account, told in first person narrative, from various mainly three pe People who did not like this book simply did not understand it.

This book is an introspective account, told in first person narrative, from various mainly three perspectives.

The setting is not Camden college, but in the minds of these young characters. Ellis brilliantly depicts how the events that take place over a few months time, are perceived and interpreted by those involved.

The book begins and ends in the middle of a sentence, symbolically stating that perhaps the reader should interpret the work as a whole in the same way.

This book is about the here and now, the present moments of these peoples lives. Any beginning or end would provide a context that might and most likely would View 2 comments.

This is the most depressing, nasty book I've read in a long time. I read it all in one go last night, since I have a hard time not finishing books once I start them, but I couldn't stand the thought of having to come back to it.

There may be some literary merit to the book that I can't appreciate it because I'm so repulsed by the characters, but I rather doubt it.

The book certainly captures the complete lack of affect and total self-absorption of the characters, as well as the compulsive, endle This is the most depressing, nasty book I've read in a long time.

The book certainly captures the complete lack of affect and total self-absorption of the characters, as well as the compulsive, endless consumption without any enjoyment or desire, which characterized a certain set in the 80's.

The description of shared events changes from narrator to narrator because they are all flattering themselves and are thoughtless of others.

The narrators almost never describe the setting, the reader gets almost no picture of Camden college, because it doesn't matter to these idiots.

Beauty, nature, architecture would fail to move them at all. Victor's trip through Europe is a prime example of this Also, everybody they know already knows Camden back to front.

The college is taken utterly for granted, certainly has nothing to do with learning, it is just the faded backdrop for their repetitive evenings of drinking and screwing each other.

Nobody really has real friends; they aimlessly, reasonlessly do things that should hurt their friends, but the friends don't really care about anything either, so no one is hurt.

They are all numb. As a few of them say, "Nobody ever knows anybody. They don't even really care if they live or die, as evidenced by the casual attempts at suicide now and again.

The fact that there is even the barest trace of a resemblance between my life and the lives of these characters is deeply disturbing. I can't imagine wanting to read this book, if my life was like this, and I can't imagine wanting to read this book if my life was thankfully nothing like this.

It's all just too ugly. View all 9 comments. This is probably the worst time to read Ellis, as he's so damn depressing. Disaffection is the perfect word for his books, the way you feel when you're reading them.

I must say, also, how great is this cover? Not sure why it is, but I think it's great. Let me try to explain. American Psycho is just Less Than Zero on some serious 50th book of American Psycho is just Less Than Zero on some serious, serious drugs - but bad drugs, the ones that give you the worst trips, like nightmares.

This, funnily enough, actually being the novel between the two, is a nice middle-ground. There isn't too much violence, and though it's everything I expected, drugs, sex, depression, suicide There's quite a nostalgic slope coming out of my University library; that's a funny way of describing it.

But, I couldn't fathom the number of times I've walked down that slope talking to someone about books, or classes, or food, or money.

In that respect, it's a nostalgic slope. The other day, I was speaking to a woman I've never met before.

Middle-aged, quite quiet, so the conversation always required a lot of attention, and gentle. She was nice. She told me that she loved Bret Easton Ellis, which surprised me.

I gave a spiel about my thoughts on Ellis hearing how it sounded as I said it, and felt sick at myself and she agreed with me. You don't want to look but you can't help yourself, was my main point.

It's a window into another life, too. And I think Ellis gets flak because what he's writing isn't romantic. He's writing about a lost generation, like Fitzgerald and Hemingway did, but their generation didn't have copious amounts of sex, or do enough cocaine to kill an elephant, or wave machetes around.

It's a difficult relationship with Ellis, it's awe, but also disgust. I guess that's what makes him so interesting. Rules of Attraction is more obviously scathing.

It's ironic. It's even playful. Here are some quotes They aren't nice. I'll say that now. A boy's thoughts on Kafka in a lecture: 'Well, like, the dude was totally depressed because, well, the dude turned into a bug and freaked out.

He's not wrong, credit to him. Though maybe 'freaked out' is a little generous of Samsa's reaction. Norris pays and ask the shy, acne-scarred cashier if she knows who wrote 'Notes from the Underground'.

The girl, who's so homely you couldn't sleep with her for money, not for anything, smiles and says no, and that he can look in the bestseller paperbacks if he'd like.

We leave the store and Norris sneers a little too meanly, "Townies are so ignorant. God spelled backwards. Get it? One of our protagonists in this is Patrick Bateman's brother, Sean Bateman.

Of course, Patrick Bateman is our American Psycho. He even has several pages from his perspective, though the voice doesn't quite match what we get later on, so Ellis maybe hadn't quite found out what he would become.

The other interesting one, is Clay's several pages, who was our protagonist in Less Than Zero - he was the only voice we heard in that novel, compared to the many in this one.

So all in all, a good Ellis book. Does that make it a 'good' book? I'm not sure. Yes and no. Do I like Ellis: yes and no.

One of the best books on insight. The setting makes this book even more pleasurable-a college campus in the 80s.

We've all contemplated simple questions like "Does my best friend secretly hate me? This book makes your insides squirm with embarrassment in the most hilarious form.

There's so many great things about this book-the ending, the graphic sex scenes and how Victor is really a boring piece of shit.

You never get One of the best books on insight. You never get attached to one cahracter, Ellis switches too fast between them, but it's what makes the book so good.

You just laugh and feel sorry for all these lost assholes. I will always say "I'm sorry what did you say?

Rock n' roll. On a side note, if you plan on reading Bret Ellis in the full, read this first. All his characters have books of their own.

The L. Bateman's brother Patrick, he's in American Psycho. I get upset when I read the best book first, but in this case you should.

I spent about a year and a half reading this book, which worked out quite well. Like Less Than Zero , the existence of a plot here is one step above accidental--a brusque necessity.

Crucial to keep things moving, but negligible if you decide to take a fourteen-month leave of absence from Brett Easton Ellis. I suspect I stopped reading the book because it contains incessant co-ed droning, and, more than a little, made me feel that I spent too many of my college days reading books.

In picking it bac I spent about a year and a half reading this book, which worked out quite well. In picking it back up, I started to appreciate its brilliance.

The Rules of Attraction manages to capture the college experience in all its perfunctoriness. Not only that, but the characterization of the wealthy New England private school is at times, well, eerily similar to the wealthy New England private school that I attended.

Okay, just a little darker. Ellis' commentary on how useless most college majors are and how unaffected many college students are was ahead of its time.

To have been reading this book--the good parts--while the college admissions scandal was unfolding was a real treat.

People have always attended college without really caring about what's waiting for them on the other side. Worse, now, people who can't afford it attend college without really caring about what's waiting for them on the other side.

I'll withhold further comment. Though Patrick Bateman has a brief cameo in this novel his younger brother is a main character , this doesn't explore sadism as American Psycho or Less Than Zero does.

It's tough to convince myself that I really do hold this opinion, but, in comparison, the book is actually quite lighthearted. Told in a free association style of rambling diary-like entries, Sean, Lauren and Paul talk about the hits and misses in their respective love lives while attending college in New England.

While the first few pages may have you thinking otherwise, this is a much lighter side of Bret Easton Ellis.

Dark comedy is a fine art, and this author does it well. However, when doing a little googly-goo of said movie, I found out this happens: Hmmmmm, maybe I should try and track down a copy.

Just to see if it maintains the integrity of the book, of course. What a deliciously wicked way to help explain the nuttery that was the Sean Bateman character.

View all 13 comments. This was so good. Following a group of friends as Camden Collage it details their life of partying, drugs, booze and sex.

It was seriously amazing. Clay was in it and so was Patrick Bateman which made me very happy.

Plus Donna Tartt reference! At the beginning of the year, I decided that in I would devote some time to working through my sprawling to-read list, whether that meant actually reading the books or throwing them out.

Perhaps rather embarrassingly, though, I loved it. It's nihilistic, sure, but also SO well observed, hyper-quotable, and parts of it had me in At the beginning of the year, I decided that in I would devote some time to working through my sprawling to-read list, whether that meant actually reading the books or throwing them out.

It's nihilistic, sure, but also SO well observed, hyper-quotable, and parts of it had me in stitches especially the scene in which a group of students rush their friend to hospital only for a bizarrely incompetent doctor to declare him dead — while he's sitting up and talking.

The characters are almost universally loathsome, but — and I wonder whether this is something I would've missed if I'd read it when I was 20 — there's vulnerability and naivety detectable in their desperate antics.

The novel as a whole is fast, funny and brilliantly awful, but it's also somewhat more human than I was expecting.

Because that is when I first read it, and when it had the most impact on my tender brain. I guess this was my first big lit read.

These are 'nice' authors,they write about love, drama, family, murder, all very plot driven. You read it once put it away and forget about them.

Trying to describe this book is really hard. There isn't a plot, I guess you can say it is a love triangle, but that would give the assumption that Easton Ellis' characters can feel.

Added in reply to request by N. The author of translation requested proofreading. If you are proficient in both languages of the language pair, you are welcome to leave your comments.

Engels Engels. Simply Irresistible. Voeg nieuwe vertaling toe Vraag een vertaling aan. Meer vertalingen van Simply Irresistible.

Frans MichelBaie. Turks dashuniv 5. Please help to translate "Simply Irresistible". Collections with "Simply Irresistible".

Ich fand sie früher gutaussehend Sie gibt mir Gefühle, Die ich noch nie gefühlt hab' Sie ist unvermeidlich, Ich bin in einer verzweifelten Lage

0 Gedanken zu “Einfach unwiderstehlich”

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *