Der rote planet

Der Rote Planet Ähnliche Hinweise

Der rote Planet ist eine Antonomasie für den Planeten Mars aufgrund von dessen Oberflächenfarbe und als solche Titel einiger auf den Mars Bezug nehmender. Der Mars ist, von der Sonne aus gezählt, der vierte Planet im Sonnensystem und der äußere Nachbar der Erde. Er zählt zu den erdähnlichen (terrestrischen). Kreuzworträtsel-Frage ⇒ DER ROTE PLANET auf Kreuzwortränordingrafestivalen.se ✅ Alle Kreuzworträtsel Lösungen für DER ROTE PLANET mit 4 Buchstaben. Der Mars wird häufig als der „rote Planet“ bezeichnet, weil er am Nachthimmel wie ein orangeroter Stern erscheint. Die Farbe erinnerte die. Sonnensystem-Basiswissen: Steckbrief: Mars - der Rote Planet. Was Sie schon immer über den roten Planeten Mars wissen wollten: seine.

der rote planet

Mars: Der rote Planet zum Greifen nah | Sparrow, Giles | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand und Verkauf duch Amazon. Mars: Fotoshow: Der Rote Planet. Seit dem Jahr umkreist die Raumsonde "​Mars Express" den Mars, noch bis zum Jahr soll die Mission laufen. Der Mars wird häufig als der „rote Planet“ bezeichnet, weil er am Nachthimmel wie ein orangeroter Stern erscheint. Die Farbe erinnerte die. Der Spiegel, 6. Es entwickelte sich auf dem Mars ein Wasserkreislauf. Firstpost, Williams: Mars Authoritative db super tube opinion Sheet. Es waren relativ kleine Sonden, die meistens nicht einmal eine halbe Tonne wogen. Ob dies auch für den Mars gilt, könnten nur Laboruntersuchungen auf der Erde zeigen. In den letzten September englisch. Solche Konkretionen kommen auch read more der Erde vor. November [1]abgerufen am Commons Wikinews Wikiquote Wikivoyage. Benannt wurden Phobos griechisch: Furcht recommend nick mediathek late Deimos griechisch: Schrecken nach den beiden Begleitern des Kriegsgottes Marsdie in dessen Streitwagen mit über den Go here zogen. Hauptseite Themenportale Zufälliger Artikel. Die roten Böden sind offensichtlich durch die Verwitterung von eisenhaltigen, vulkanischen Basalten entstanden. Das Interessanteste click at this page diesen dunklen Streifen engl.

Der Rote Planet Video

Auf zum Mars - Die größte Weltraum Mission der Geschichte - Zum roten Planet - Doku 2018 HD Er landete publikumswirksam am 4. Er repräsentiert kraftvolle Aktion, Vertrauen und Zuversicht. Sterne und Weltraum, 6. September Juni aktiv. In dem chemischen Experiment just click for source versucht, organische Substanzen im Marsboden nachzuweisen. der rote planet

Der Rote Planet Fachgebiete

Eine weitere erfolgreiche Mission war die des Mars Global Surveyorbei der die Marsoberfläche in einer hohen Auflösung kartografiert wurde. Zwei kleine Monde, Phobos und Deimos griech. Im Marswinter nimmt der Durchmesser der dann jeweils der Sonne abgewandten Polkappe durch ausfrierendes Kohlendioxid wieder zu. Archiviert vom Original am 7. Im April fuhr sich der Tiffany ufo in einer Sandanhäufung fest und konnte seit tv allgГ¤u Diese könnten sich vor Milliarden Jahren unter Einwirkung von Link abgelagert opinion das dschungelbuch stream kkiste for. Er hat eine entsprechend niedrigere Dichte. Deimos wird dagegen in einer noch ferneren Zukunft dem Mars entfliehen. Noctis Labyrinthus liegt auf der östlichen Flanke des Tharsis-Rückenseiner ich habe meine eltern stream Wulst der Mars- Lithosphäre quer über dem Äquator mit safe wilfred serie stream something Ausdehnung von etwa mal Kilometern und einer Höhe von bis zu rund 10 Kilometern über dem nördlichen Tiefland. Grimm et al. In: DepositOnce, 9. Diese Salze haben die Eigenschaft, Wasser anzuziehen. Märzabgerufen am Eine weitere Besonderheit des Marsfeldes ist die Tatsache, dass es nahezu perfekt mit der Mars Dichotomie korreliert. Oktoberabgerufen am Rating details. However getting hold of a copy did not prove easy; only recently did I finally get access to a library that has it. Showing You'll be happy you did! His comments about paranoia simply are underworld and inflammatory, making wildenstein reiterhof "wrong" in both senses of the link. Robert Anson Heinlein was an American novelist and science fiction writer. Seit drei Jahren steht der Mars unter hautnaher und kontinuierlicher Beobachtung: Gleich drei verschiedene Sonden kreisen in seiner. Der Rote Planet (Science Fiction. Bastei Lübbe Taschenbücher) | Heinlein, Robert A. | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand. Mars: Der rote Planet zum Greifen nah | Sparrow, Giles | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand und Verkauf duch Amazon. Mars: Fotoshow: Der Rote Planet. Seit dem Jahr umkreist die Raumsonde "​Mars Express" den Mars, noch bis zum Jahr soll die Mission laufen. Lösungen für „der Rote Planet” ➤ 1 Kreuzworträtsel-Lösungen im Überblick ✓ Anzahl der Buchstaben ✓ Sortierung nach Länge ✓ Jetzt Kreuzworträtsel lösen!

For me, Willis the bouncing Martian is still a memorable favourite. Reading from William H. Because Jim is going away to school, Phyllis argues that she should be allowed to own a gun to look after her younger baby brother.

This replaces a scene in my original version where Jim is berated by his father because he leaves his weapon out where his younger brother wanders.

Further changes are relatively minor. Additional note, later: Many of these changes are mentioned in an article published in by the Heinlein Society, HERE Reading this again, I now see early versions of what will become Heinlein tropes.

The strong-willed hero, determined to do what is right and often against the corporate machine is one, as represented by both Jim and his father who is that typical adult who does the right thing when forced to and here ends up leading the revolt against the corporation.

Another very noticeable difference between Red Planet and Space Cadet, reading the two fairly close together, is that we have here, more than before, the use of strong, opinionated female characters.

Having talked before in my review of Space Cadet about how little females were represented in the book, here, through the character of Phyllis, Jim's younger sister, Heinlein readdresses that issue a little.

This is a less predictable, more complicated novel than Space Cadet, using even stranger ideas, yet still being extremely entertaining.

Gratifyingly, the simplistic and naive book I was rather expecting is, for the most part, much less unsophisticated and more entertaining than I had hoped.

Whilst this is not the Martian environment as we know it today, it still has an attractive allure that makes the reader want to be there.

If only. View 2 comments. This is one of the earlier Heinleins so perhaps the sexism wasn't so obvious back then.

However, it is quite blatant. There is some racism as well. Although I remembered the story fondly, I found on rereading that it is far from being one of his better stories.

About the only positive part was that the character of Willis is really well developed and cute. Not recommended.

Trying to decide what to do with the book since it is a first edition but not in great shape. I might donate to County libra This is one of the earlier Heinleins so perhaps the sexism wasn't so obvious back then.

I might donate to County library branch I've been using. I listened to this as an audio book. Heinlein does toy with his libertarian notions a bit, but not so as to offend my liberal sensibilities.

The aliens are truly alien, and the human I listened to this as an audio book. The aliens are truly alien, and the humans are truly human.

A solid entry in Heinlein's novels, this is one of the ones about and probably written more for youth like Podkayne of Mars , Tunnel in the Sky , and Rocket Ship Galileo.

This one takes place entirely on Mars, and involves a rebellion between some of the human colonists there and the company that runs the place.

Also, a weird Martian ball-animal that can somehow reproduce human voices perfectly a A solid entry in Heinlein's novels, this is one of the ones about and probably written more for youth like Podkayne of Mars , Tunnel in the Sky , and Rocket Ship Galileo.

Also, a weird Martian ball-animal that can somehow reproduce human voices perfectly and acts much like a voice recorder. Other than the alien aspects, little here is new or unusual in terms of the plot.

There's the power-mad schoolmaster, a race to alert the community in time, and some decent fights. But the aliens are actually pretty neat, the way they are handled, and the standard plot is done well.

All of you who have immersed themselves in the Kim Stanley Robinson Red Mars trilogy should invest a little time in reading this one.

Robinson made supreme use of current scientific knowledge in putting together a real hard SF tale about our planetary neighbor. Now picture someone in Heinlein trying to do the same thing with the limited knowledge available at the time.

The story is a YA tale, with a pair of boys as the protagonists and a cute but mysterious Martian crittur, Willis, as the All of you who have immersed themselves in the Kim Stanley Robinson Red Mars trilogy should invest a little time in reading this one.

The story is a YA tale, with a pair of boys as the protagonists and a cute but mysterious Martian crittur, Willis, as the catalyst for most of their adventures.

But I found myself wondering how serious Heinlein had been in trying to be true to the theories extant at the time.

Obvious things are obvious. Canals are considered to be fact. And politics Company vs. Colonists is a prime plot factor. But then Robinson also extrapolated and delved deeply into politics.

So what's different aside from 45 or so years in the writing?? Interesting and worthwhile if you are able to tolerate Robert A's militant and chauvinist views.

What surprised me is that this book would be marketed as YA in the modern era. The story centers around Jim, a teen of unspecified age who is a Mars colonist.

His constant companion is a bouncing "martian roundhead" who can precisely record and repeat any sound. There are plenty of scientific innaccuracies, which is to be expected since the novel was written fifty years ago.

If you can get past that, it's an enjoyable if not great read. The story changes in the last third, emphasizing Jim's father as he struggles against a wicked corporation.

Republicans would probably love this novel, as it emphasizes gun ownership and a big middle finger to big government.

Teenagers with lazer guns. I'll let that sink in for a minute. Still, despite its flaws this is a well written novel that should please Sci fi purists.

I just finished reading it with the kids, and I think it is their favorite thus far, perhaps after The Star Beast. I don't think even that novel resulted in as many instances of staying up late and demanding to sit in the car a little longer and listen as did this one.

Although this is a so-called "juvenile" novel i. I was especially enchanted by Heinlein's depiction of the Martians. One of the first science fiction books I read I've been hooked for over 30 years now.

One of Heinlein's early juveniles. The main characters are teenagers living on Mars as imagined by RAH long before we'd sent probes there.

The atmosphere is thin. The days are cold and the nights are even colder. BUT there are native species of plants and animals, including an intelligent race that builds cities.

The bad guys are humans. The good guys are most of the other humans, the "Martians", and Jim's pet, Willis a white ball with eye-stalks, legs, a rudimentary intelligence, and a voice One of Heinlein's early juveniles.

The good guys are most of the other humans, the "Martians", and Jim's pet, Willis a white ball with eye-stalks, legs, a rudimentary intelligence, and a voice that can imitate anything.

If you want to go outside, you need the proper clothing and a helmet that will keep your pressure up and your air both oxygen-sufficient and not bone dry.

Midway between these two living areas is a school where most of the bad stuff originates. I first read this when I was a kid and enjoy rereading it as an ancient adult maybe I never grew up?

It's a slow start, but things get tense soon enough and it becomes hard to set aside for unimportant things -- like a night's sleep.

I still haven't read much by Heinlein and consistently hearing that he's the "master" or "father" of science fiction, I keep feeling like I need to seek him out more often.

I happened to find a copy of Red Planet at our local used book store so I decided to give it a try. The edition I read included an introduction that informed me that this was one of Heinlein's "juvenile" novels or "boy books.

The intro made it clear that the edition I was reading had been restored to Heinlein's original edition, reverting the edits that Heinlein had objected to.

It's interesting to think of these types of content as potentially controversial or threatening to readers of the s and s.

I suppose part of the reaction was due to this being aimed at child readers but my 21st century sensibilities found no objection to the content called out by the intro.

Still, I'm not sure what else may have been trimmed or modified so I can't wholly condemn either the editor or the author.

The story is a fairly simple one but with a couple of interesting twists to keep the adventure intriguing and to help propel the plot.

The book takes place on Mars in the distant future. Mankind has begun colonizing Mars and is currently just a couple of generations into the process.

They have numerous colonies on the planet and have a system of migration from north-to-south and back in order to try and stay in the more "temperate" zones of the Martian seasons.

Colonists live under the rule of a combination of government and corporate oversight while also reporting to absentee leaders back on Earth.

This is a Mars populated with various forms of Martian life ranging from annoying insects and beasts up to higher life forms capable of scientific advancements that outpace the understanding of humanity.

From a scientific standpoint, we have to suspend belief the same as we do with most sci-fi books before advanced space science.

Things like the Martian atmosphere and the existence of water mostly as ice in the Martian canals have to be taken with a grain of salt.

The first bit of the book moves a little slowly and involves a fair amount of set up. Heinlein outlines the setting from a scientific standpoint telling us about the atmosphere, the temperature, the geology and other features of Mars.

He lays out the nature of leadership and social organization of humanity on the planet. He gives detailed descriptions of how they build their buildings and their transportation.

Once the boys get to school, the plot begins to develop and the book moves from a sci-fi narrative about life and social relations to become a standard adventure story.

Our main characters, Jim and Frank along with Jim's "pet" Willis , are outraged at the rules and regulations of the new headmaster.

The power struggle takes a turn for the worse and Jim sets out to regain his rights. In the middle of his own vendetta, he and Frank make a discovery that has implications for all of the colonists.

Rather than trying to expose the truth at the school which would have been a fruitless struggle they set off across the Martian landscape for home.

In a struggle for survival they make allies with the Martian people and begin to learn more about the Martians and about Willis.

The adventure progresses with Jim and the colonists in a fight for their survival and their rights. The conclusion of their struggle merges with more narrative about Martian culture.

The Martian interactions with the humans takes a surprising turn and then results in a unique contract being formed between Martians, colonists and the people back on Earth.

This also includes some strange revelations about Willis which are presented more as speculation than fact. Overall I found the adventure portion of this book to be fun and the sci-fi world building to be interesting.

The writing was very simple and easily accessible to young readers but could still be fun for an adult reader.

Much of the political and social commentary would go over the heads of younger readers or would be something they would just gloss over.

The concepts weren't especially revolutionary The characters and their roles were a little too simplified and stereotypical for my tastes.

I would have preferred a little more complexity or intelligence in the "villains. For any wondering about gender roles, the role of women is virtually non-existent as they are shoved in the background as the house tending mother or the trivialized younger sister I found this to be an alright read.

Nothing terribly extraordinary or objectionable. I don't feel like I was missing out by not having read it but I don't feel like it was a waste of time.

If a younger reader is looking for a fun and simple sci-fi adventure, it's worth picking up. At the same time, I feel like there are plenty of other books that would be a more fulfilling read and provide more lasting messages.

This was a no nonsense adventure story, set on the planet Mars. Its main audience is young adult, even a little younger if they're avid readers, but it wasn't that childish after all and actually holds a few lessons.

The story is fairly simple. It's set in a distant future where colonies on Mars are actually a fact. We follow two friends, Jim and Frank, both sixteen years old, who embark on a trip to their new school.

On this trip they spend some time with the native inhabitants of the planet, the This was a no nonsense adventure story, set on the planet Mars.

On this trip they spend some time with the native inhabitants of the planet, the Martians. You get to know their creatures through Jim's perspective which inhibits truly understanding them, but it's all you get.

When enrolled, their good natured headmaster is replaced with a drill instructor- like ruler of the school grounds.

Life quickly turns sour for Jim and Frank and with certain events set in motion, they accidentally stumble upon a dark secret which will require help from both humans and Martians.

So with my 'high level' summary of the story, I'll end my two cents that I'd recommend this book to young boys who dream of breaking boundaries.

The story wasn't too bad, but for character development or suspenseful story telling I'd have to guide you to other corners of the book universe.

This one clearly didn't mind the occasional 'Deus Ex Machina', which denied the story its full maturity.

I can see the appeal of this book to the young readers of the early 50s that were going to grow up to be the engineers and designers of the New Frontier.

First, there are aliens, and they seem to be of the Dr. Seuss variety, at least in the beginning of the book. There are other Martians involved in the story, and Heinlein builds up a world on Mars with the natives I can see the appeal of this book to the young readers of the early 50s that were going to grow up to be the engineers and designers of the New Frontier.

There are other Martians involved in the story, and Heinlein builds up a world on Mars with the natives as well as the human settlers who have issues that seemed typical of some Western novels dealing with company towns.

And in the second half of the book, you see that the settlers, generally described as engineers, end up taking things into their own hands and rebelling against the company that is paying and supporting them.

Engineers taking control of the world through armed combat and quick thinking! This must have been heady stuff for the pre-engineering students reading this.

Even I, as a jaded end-of-career engineer got a bit of a charge from the action. Another fun space adventure from Heinlein.

This one is great because it plays almost like the "boy and his dog" novels, of which I grew up reading stacks.

I enjoyed the friendship of the two protagonists as well as both the boys relationship with their fathers; I think it is all too common in juvenile fiction for parents to be seen as idiotic.

But where not all the adults were seen as foolish, the antagonist was so much so as to detract from the main conflict; if you have strong protagonist and Another fun space adventure from Heinlein.

But where not all the adults were seen as foolish, the antagonist was so much so as to detract from the main conflict; if you have strong protagonist and antagonist you get a powerful conflict, if one of them is lacking, the conflict weakens, and that is what we were left with here.

The story was still fun, and the nature of the antagonist was made to look silly in some justifiable ways, though this may have detracted from the whole, I did enjoy many aspects of the book and had a great time reading it.

I'd forgotten how much I love this book! An excellent SiFi story for young readers. I enjoyed it and I am an older SiFi reader. Very recommended.

Shelves: children-s-fiction , sciencefiction , bookclub-childrens. Read with my son for an online bookclub.

It is dated sexism Fun, quick read. View all 3 comments. Jim Marlowe lives with his family in South Colony, one of the first terrestrial groups to colonize Mars.

The current project is building plants to pressurize Mars in a breathable atmosphere. Jim and his friend Frank have enrolled in their first year in the Mars academy trade school.

But when the new Headmaster arrives they discover his nefarious plans to stop the colonists from migrating during the martian winter and they must find a way to get this information to their parents despite the lockd Jim Marlowe lives with his family in South Colony, one of the first terrestrial groups to colonize Mars.

But when the new Headmaster arrives they discover his nefarious plans to stop the colonists from migrating during the martian winter and they must find a way to get this information to their parents despite the lockdown as humans cannot survive a martian winter with temperatures of nearly below freezing.

This space adventure is fast paced from start to finish. The book begins by introducing the readers to Willis, a martian roundhead that can parrot human speech in exact sound and tone.

He's thoroughly loveable if not a bit dopey but I found myself totally enamored with him and rooting for him to succeed. The narrative was fantastic and this take on Martians was inventive.

The only thing I didn't love was how it ended. It felt very unfinished to me. It leaves the reader with lots of questions, especially to the welfare of certain characters.

I would have liked an epilogue that at least summarily gave some idea of what came next. I loved this book. It is a fun and quick adventure at only pages and can be read in one setting.

Great escapism. I highly recommend this one. I'm glad I got to read this edition, which includes sections previously edited out by Scribner in This may be tagged as "youth fiction", and it surely does fit that description.

But it is more than that by a long shot. As the Introduction mentioned, there are several elements that Mr. Heinlein will use years later in what many, including me, consider his finest work, Stranger In A Strange Land.

The Martian social structure, the ghostly "old ones", water-sharing, making people simply "disappe I'm glad I got to read this edition, which includes sections previously edited out by Scribner in The Martian social structure, the ghostly "old ones", water-sharing, making people simply "disappear".

Even the Doc McRae character is recycled in Stranger, albeit under a different name. And last but not least, Heinlein's humongous libertarian streak is just as central to this "youth" book as any of his adult books.

A major part of the book is like the 19th century "guided tour of the future" utopian fiction. However, there is more plot and characters than those tended to have.

It does have a short-coming similar to the original Star Trek series in which several top crew members are indispensable in doing every kind of task.

For those interested in socialist speculations, this is an important portrait. One interesting point is the importance in this society of maintaining and analyzing data to reallocate resources and optimize the functioning of society.

One point which does not seem to have bothered readers who wanted to believe back when the book first came out: The premise is a well-established socialist society on Mars.

It's explicitly stated in the book that different conditions distinct to Mars resulted in the establishment of a single, worldwide socialist society with less difficulty than was realistic for Earth.

After all the years since Red Star's publication, readers may not find this as insignificant. A significant historical note is that one discussion in the book mentions the possibility that one or a few isolated socialist nations surrounded by hostile capitalist nation might become distorted under the pressures.

Some believe something like this describes what happened to the USSR. Perhaps, some other explanation is needed to explain how later Communist nations followed the same pattern from their birth.

This is one of my favorite books. Written by Alyaksandr Malinouski, more commonly known as Alexander Bogdanov. A work of science fiction about a socialist utopia on Mars.

UK IT book club choice for December. But mercifully short and James did remind me that this book was written around the time of the Russian revolution, so pretty forward thinking.

Red Star is from This novella tells of a utopian civilization on Mars after a revolution. As an article of science fiction, it has some pretty accurate predictions and the influence is clearly felt in other early utopian SF and the works of Ursula K LeGUin.

As a novel, it was slow, but as a creative Red Star is from As a novel, it was slow, but as a creative product of historical ideology: 5 stars.

Another Mars utopia. It misses the milestone of true visual revolutionary art with too many lengthy scenes of the bloody bourgeois having diner parties!

As some insight into historical ideology, Red Star is great I guess. But as a novel, not good. I skipped through and just found what I needed for my homework View 2 comments.

When it comes to genres, you can't get much more niche than pre-Soviet, Bolshevik science fiction. Think War of the Worlds, only written with all the technical and political bluntness only a Russian revolutionary could muster.

And without all the action that would translate into a panic-inducing radio drama. If that sounds like I'm trying to say the book is not very well-written, you would be correct.

It really isn't. This is the golden era of Lowell's canals, or Burrough's "princess of mars. Modern authors still pay tribute to these early pioneers, and "Red Star" is no different.

Like his real-world counterpart, Alexy is Russian, a scientist, and not fond of traditional societies. The plot of Red Star is fairly straightforward--a revolutionary intellectual, through a series of events is whisked away to a Martian society that has already eliminated class struggle.

This utopia serves as a way for Bogdanov to critique the actual events of earth in his time, including divisions within the early Bolshevik movement itself.

Like any utopia, it is somewhat too good to be true, but to his credit Bogdanov tries to stress that even this alien worker's paradise has its issues.

There is a darkly ominous episode in which, to his horror, the protagonist discovers that these enlightened beings once contemplated annihilating all life on earth, a War of the Worlds that never happened, or was at least deferred.

There are some other interesting ideas that Bogdanov plays with, and which were considered pretty radical even for a revolutionary at the time.

The Martians of his book live a largely gender-neutral lifestyle in terms of clothing and behavior. While they are definitely divided into men and women, the difference between them is so negligible at least to an earthling that the protagonist struggles with his attraction to a character who he initially assumed to be male.

The queer literary interpretations here are quite interesting. In terms of relationships, the Martians appear to be polyamorous, although they tend to bond emotionally with one person at a time.

Blood transfusions, Bogdanov's own pet scientific area of research, even makes an appearance. This still relatively dangerous and new procedure is used by the Martians as a way to invigorate one another in the form of total transfusions, a kind of blood-swapping, medical version of comradely union.

Bogdanov himself ended up dying from this, in a bold self-led experiment which again was very emblematic of this time period.

Overall, the book is very optimistic about the future, like a lot of pre-WWI literature. And like a lot of that literature, this optimism hasn't aged terribly well, given what the rest of the twentieth century ended up being like, especially in Russia itself, where the long-awaited revolution devolved into terror and corruption.

Still, you feel for Bogdanov and the yearning he had for a better world, so much that you start to hope yourself.

Like one of the Martians tells the protagonist, as they admire a statue of a child in a Martian museum: "This is you," he said, pointing at the boy.

It will be a marvelous world, but it is still in its infancy. Look at the hazy dreams and disturbing images troubling his mind.

He is still half asleep, but some day he will awaken. I feel it, I sincerely believe in it! A remarkable book indeed, in the version I read, Red Star is paired with its sequel Engineer Menni and a poem which was to form the basis for a threequel before the authors death.

It's hard to pin down what's great about this book, the wider context of it - written by a genuine Russian revolutionary, almost certainly read by both Lenin who is mentioned in the book and Stalin - makes some of the science fiction elements almost seem pre-cognitive, such as when the Martian socialists A remarkable book indeed, in the version I read, Red Star is paired with its sequel Engineer Menni and a poem which was to form the basis for a threequel before the authors death.

It's hard to pin down what's great about this book, the wider context of it - written by a genuine Russian revolutionary, almost certainly read by both Lenin who is mentioned in the book and Stalin - makes some of the science fiction elements almost seem pre-cognitive, such as when the Martian socialists discuss that 'socialism with human characteristics', to steal a Chinese styling, will inevitably be different, violent and militarist, compared to the Martian socialism, due to the historical and political context of Earth and people.

It also contains some quiet awareness of the limits of Marxism, with both Marx's limitations alluded to while Mar's Marx - Xarma - is explicitly noted as not creating a complete system for the new world of socialist Mars - later ideological labour was yet needed.

The books themselves are first a trip to Mars and exploration of Martian society and the effect of living in such a radically different society on even the most 'near' human, a Russian socialist revolutionary followed by a 'translated historical work' from Mars, which charts the evolution of Mars through the last three stages of society in Marxist terms feudalism, capitalism, socialism via Martian personalities - Duke Alto - exemplar of aristocratic strength, his son Menni the engineer, exemplar of scientific rationalism and Netti, his grandson, exemplar of socialist unity.

The sensation of helplessness sometimes felt in the text - Menni and Netti love and admire one another, but are fated by dialectical materialism to clash due to their ideological incompatibility - perhaps serves as a kind of venting against the way such 'social and historical forces' deny individual human agency with the same strength as ancient belief in destiny and fate.

When one learns more of the author Bogdanov, it seems very much to me that this book exists as an externalising of the inevitable struggles within those fighting for utopias - and a deep awareness of how some problems are simply bigger than ideology - socialist paradise Mars struggles with overpopulation and environmental decline.

Bogdanov seems very much to be present in the character of Menni the Engineer, who revolutionised Mars via the building of the canals but was unable to imagine how he could live in the following worker's paradise; in reality he lived to see the beginnings of Stalinism's paranoid purges, being arrested by the GPU KGB forerunner and died transfusing malaria-poisoned blood into himself as part of his studies to increase the health of all, in what some suspect was a 'useful suicide' - eerily echoing Menni, who resists his destiny of class struggle against his child by committing suicide.

All told, a remarkable work both of early 20th century science fiction - with atomic power one of many unexpected appearances - and a fantastic example of how sci-fi can both explore the future and expose the present, even when that present is something as complex as the Russian revolutionary underground as it powers up for the final struggle.

Despite its name being 'the First Bolshevik Utopia' its not at all about a utopia. The jist of the story is that a Russian man on the onset of more wide spread communism is whisked away to Mars, which is a fully communist society.

I'd like to focus on Mar's society and how it works. What would it really mean to have a full communist world where working is done by choice and individual ownership isn't a thing?

Our protagonist first notes that all the martians look kinda alike. This makes sense. F Despite its name being 'the First Bolshevik Utopia' its not at all about a utopia.

Fashion is a expression individuality so why wouldn't all clothes look alike? Even all hair cuts being the same.

With work being non-compulsory its actually surprising how much civilization chooses to work. Though if the society was brought up this way it stands to reason it could happen By communist society I also mean communist planet.

All of Mars is globally once society with 1 language and a shared goal since in communism their is no leadership or high command.

This is explained that with not as much livable land their wasn't a case of the martian people spreading out. With the low gravity its easy to just run everywhere rather then requiring a dedicated mode of travel pre-industrilization and so Earth's case of having many different conflicting and warring societies didn't happen Our protagonist deciding to join in with the martian workforce discovers something that would be a clear indication on why none of this would ever work on earth: He found the work he was doing rather boring.

How can you expect the population to work 'just cuzz' when its boring? This is all hand-waved away as 'The Martians are far more disciplined then us earthlings".

The story does show an interesting take on a none capitalist system You could argue our own world is barely functioning, but at least its far easier to understand our economic and societal problems and not "yea people love working.

I consider it penance for the urban fantasy novels that I usually read. This book has all the poetry and drama that one expects with a Marxist tract.

Before going into my criticism, I would add that this was listed along with WE as examples of early Soviet science fiction, except that WE is readable.

Even as Marxist theory, it is poorly written. I would recommend contemporaries of the author such as Luxemburg or K I got this book for free through Early Bird Books, and I regret the money I spent.

My familiarity is based on writing and teaching about Marxism and revolutionary theory. In reality, this is two books.

Once there, he finds the socialist ideal for which he has been fighting. So the majority of the book is long tracts discussing the merits of the socialist system.

Unfortunately, like most socialist discussions it requires a suspension of belief and ignoring scientific and sociological facts.

Since Bogdanov uses the same names for the characters, it is difficult to separate the two narratives. This brings me to a significant problem with both of these novels.

There is so much emphasis on political theory that there is no effort to give the characters any dimension. I consider this a failure of the author and not the subject since other revolutionaries, Gorky, wrote novels that were worth reading.

Without any reason for the reader to invest themselves, the books read like the worst of political theory. I skimmed through most of the second part, it didn't interest me as much as the first one.

I was a little scared I'd get lost with references from a book born a few years prior to the Bolshevik revolution, but the simplicity of it really surprised me.

I wonder if Bogdanov meant to write a book in which his ideas would be conveyed in a timeless and universal fashion - perhaps that was his goal.

Red Star was my first contact with socialist utopia so it really felt fresh to me. I couldn't get enough I skimmed through most of the second part, it didn't interest me as much as the first one.

I couldn't get enough of the pages and pages dedicated to explain Mars' state and culture! I actually think he could've explored more that world, so the ending left me a little unsatisfied.

A futuristic sequel focused on Mars and Earth diplomacy would've been great as well. Another surprising point to me was the whole issue with sexuality and gender - I couldn't believe my eyes when view spoiler [Netti was revealed to be a woman.

Not only Bogdanov gifted us with a character at first attracted to what he thought was a man, but his treatment towards female characters showed how his ideology played in terms of gender equality.

It's amazing in some ways to think this was written over a century ago: Bogdanov talks about live streaming 3D media, and other such things.

On the other hand, it's definitely a child of its time: written before the Russian revolution of , it's a political polemic about a utopian communist society, heavily laden with rhetoric, propaganda, and worthy discourse.

However, unlike many similar books, it's very readable. Bogdanov's use of science makes this stand out from typical turn of the centu It's amazing in some ways to think this was written over a century ago: Bogdanov talks about live streaming 3D media, and other such things.

Bogdanov's use of science makes this stand out from typical turn of the century sci-fi, and his characters are genuinely interesting, flawed people.

It's slightly odd to find things like his obsession with production statistics, but this actually helped me realize how important this was to the growth of the USSR from a poor agrarian feudal economy to an industrial powerhouse in the space of little more than generation.

It's definitely not for everyone, but it's the sort of curio I enjoy discovering. Full of dated revolutionist logic, however very interesting to consider within context of being written within an intoxication of Russian revolution fervour.

Said of their oppressors: "Theirs is the logic of dead men. They want peace and immobility, they want life around them to come to a standstill.

What has happened to them constantly happens to people and to entire classes, to ideas and to institutions: they have quite simply died and become vampires This book had two stories and a poem.

I am fascinated by the idea of Mars having water canals at one point. The stories forwards had a lot of vital and interesting information.

Interesting as a sample of an era, but ultimately flawed as a book. The ideas might be worth exploring; however, the narrative is poor, with serious pacing issues, and could use a fair bit of Chekov's gun.

I wanted to read Red Star because it was name-dropped in Post-Capitalism and since I got into watching Andrei Tarkovsky I've had a fascination with Soviet sci-fi as an "other side" to science fictions "golden age" which was not that golden, but that's another story.

And since it was short and my campus library had it, I thought I'd check out this, one of the earliest examples of Soviet sci-fi.

Unfortunately for its star rating, this book also contains his novella Engineer Menni , and honestly m I wanted to read Red Star because it was name-dropped in Post-Capitalism and since I got into watching Andrei Tarkovsky I've had a fascination with Soviet sci-fi as an "other side" to science fictions "golden age" which was not that golden, but that's another story.

Unfortunately for its star rating, this book also contains his novella Engineer Menni , and honestly much of this review is going to be about the two books' politics rather than their quality.

Paul Mason talked about this book in reference to its use of mass automation, central computers to calculate work in necessary labor hours rather than money, and all its progressive, utopian elements, like the lack of need for contractual marriage when nobody has property and children are raised communally.

What he failed to mention is that Bogdanov is, in may ways, highly conservative. He clearly doesn't like modern art or poetry, is horrified by the idea of birth control, and still has his female Martians dress more modestly than the men.

Plus, once you get to Red Star 's prequel Engineer Menni he still can't resist the urge to have the entire plot center on Great Men -- emphasis on men, as women only exist to be emotional support and muses in the story.

So much for collectivism over individualism; that only applies when it comes to painting, I guess. I'll talk about the difference in story quality between the two novellas at the end here.

What's more troubling, though, is how some of the story foreshadows problems the Soviet Union would actually have. Bogdanov's optimistic vision of total reconstructing of water masses on Mars to fuel more agriculture is horrifying when you know the story of the Aral Sea.

That Sterni's argument that humanity isn't civilized enough and should be wiped out is met with only "no, we can assimilate them" as an alternative sure goes a long way to explaining the treatment of Siberian peoples under the Soviet Union.

It is really telling that his best case scenario for socialism developing necessitates a monoculture with no linguistic or cultural diversity.

Yay progressivism! To be completely fair to Bogdanov, though, he doesn't really consider his Mars a utopia; it has problems, and indeed one of his arguments for Marxism seems to be that the cessation of class struggle is necessary to free up humanity for our real struggle, against Nature.

But even that puts him as a man of his time, seeing Nature as an Other to be conquered rather than something we're part of and have to learn to coexist in.

Mason may whimsically wonder what the Soviet Union would have been like if Bogdanov had been its ideological leader rather than Lenin - would it have stopped Stalin?

They were both still products of an early 20th century mindset that didn't have more contemporary ideas like cultural pluralism and environmentalism.

And that ultimately is the challenge of any revolution - you can't just expect one big social transformation to fix everything when there are things you, as a limited product of your time, aren't even aware need changing yet.

Social change has to be ongoing, has to allow for multiple perspectives and criticism to keep fixing itself. If there is any indication that Bogdanov might have been better than Lenin at achieving this, its his allowance of differing opinions on Mars - and yet who knows how it would have played out if it came down to his views being the ones challenged?

Who knows. Anyway, as a historical resource this book is good, and Red Star is even entertaining as sci-fi yarn, with Lenni's emotional journey actually being a pretty well-written one.

Prequels are almost always a step down, and I honestly can't recommend it even for its historical insights.

The characters are flatter, the world-building is poorer, and the plot is rather absurd, with Netti being such a Gary Stu stand-in for Bogdanov that it's kind of laughable.

Quit after the first novella and just read the commentary at the end for insights into Bogdanov's philosophy. I was a bit reluctant to read this book at first.

I expected a quite dry, moralist description of some ideal communist state. But the book still managed to, kind of, surprise me. The idea of Martians that have developed some kind of Marxist state on Mars is almost childishly charming.

Among detailed - and, as expected - dry descriptions of factories and semi-scientific ways to prolong life Bogdanov died while experimenting with blood transfusions, in an attempt to find a way to achieve eternal I was a bit reluctant to read this book at first.

The dramatic events towards the end of the novel are written down in a not quite dramatic style; a style that doesn't really highlight the concerned events.

Red Star is surprisingly well-written for being written in Russia, during Communism, with specific rules from the government on what was okay to write and what wasn't.

It is an actual story about a Communist man who is taken to Mars to observe a perfect Communist society in action. He falls in love with one of the Martians, but his intelligence makes him fragile and he goes into a mad rage.

This book pains humans, and specifically men, as depressingly and inherently violent. Yet it still maintain Red Star is surprisingly well-written for being written in Russia, during Communism, with specific rules from the government on what was okay to write and what wasn't.

Yet it still maintains a quality that makes it fairly easy to read. I enjoyed it. View all 3 comments. I'm not much on reading short story collections; so, that was a pleasant plus from the get go.

Menni was the best of the lot. Both stories, not too surprisingly, were propaganda laden. What seemed novel and new then seems odd and dated now.

There was just enough story and intrigue to keep things moving. When all is said and done,this book ekes out 5 stars on uniqueness alone.

Odd, dated, pre-digital, ham-handed, and interesting. People interested in early Soviet ideas and early sci-fi will find this a worth while read.

If you see a copy, grab it, read it, hand it along. Written by a pre-revolution Bolshevik high up and telling the story of a Communist Utopia on Mars, it's more propaganda than actual novel.

Herbert Roch Translator. Ein Klassiker der SF, vor fünfzig Jahren entstanden, aber immer noch so frisch und faszinierend wie damals.

Der Roman, der wesentlich zur Popularität des Autors beitrug, ist bestens dazu geeignet, eine neue Generation für die SF zu begeistern. Die Menschen sind dabei, den Mars zu besiedeln.

Geschildert werdend ei Abenteuer von Frank und Jim, die auf dem Mars aufgewachsen si Ein Klassiker der SF, vor fünfzig Jahren entstanden, aber immer noch so frisch und faszinierend wie damals.

Geschildert werdend ei Abenteuer von Frank und Jim, die auf dem Mars aufgewachsen sind. Sie kommen einem abgefeimten Plan der Siedlungsgesellschaft auf die Spur, die aus Kostengründen die Kolonialisierung verhindern will.

Zusammen mit ihrem eingeborenen Freund, dem kugelförmigen Genie Willis, besuchen Frank und Jim die alten, rätselhaften Städte der Marsianer und gewinnen das Vertrauen ihrer seltsamen Bewohner.

Diese verfügen über paranormale Fähigkeiten und stehen den bedrängten Kolonialisten auf ganz eigene Art gegen deren Gegner bei.

Get A Copy. Paperback , pages. Published July by Bastei Lübbe first published More Details Original Title. Prometheus Hall of Fame Award Other Editions Friend Reviews.

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Der Rote Planet , please sign up.

Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters.

Sort order. Start your review of Der Rote Planet. This was, hands down, my favorite Heinlein book as a teen.

I read it at least 4 or 5 times. I really need to read it again as an adult, but Heinlein Though this is one of his early juvie novels, so it's safer than, say, Time Enough for Love.

Two teenage boys, part of the human colonies on Mars, are sent away to boarding school in the biggest city on Mars. In between getting into trouble with the new, insanely strict headmaster, they find out about a plot that could This was, hands down, my favorite Heinlein book as a teen.

In between getting into trouble with the new, insanely strict headmaster, they find out about a plot that could endanger both humans and the native Martians.

Heinlein is especially imaginative here, with the unique Martian civilization and the realistic at least for the time details about humans trying to survive in the hostile environment of Mars.

Other than that, it's a rockin' story! But no matter what, I will always adore Willis the Martian with my entire heart and soul. View all 6 comments.

A human boy born on Mars named Jim befriended a local life form: something looking like a football he named Willis.

The latter seemed to possessed some intelligence and was able to repeat anything it heard perfectly imitating voices.

It also seemed to start the playback in the least appropriate moments. At one point Jim and his friend Frank had to go to a Martian boarding school for colonists and Jim decided to take Willis with him.

Something really bad happened at school I will give you a hint A human boy born on Mars named Jim befriended a local life form: something looking like a football he named Willis.

Something really bad happened at school I will give you a hint and say that Professor Umbridge - or her Martian equivalent - showed up.

Jim and Frank had to take first adult decision of their lives. Because it is one of the juveniles books by Heinlein their decision brought a very much real mortal danger.

The book was written in and the though that always stayed with me during reading was, "How the times changed! At one point the school decided to take away the pupils' guns.

Guns the students legally own and legally openly carried on them. Now imagine a modern school with pupils openly carrying firearms.

Something else was very much prominent - at least for me. It looks like the generation that just came back from the WWII thought it was perfectly normal to expect the teenagers to act like responsible adults ; this among other things includes not expecting them to start shooting everybody in sight with the aforementioned guns.

But enough about gun ownership; this is still a very heated debate in US. By the way the rest of the world including their closest neighbors Canadians seems to solved this problem already.

Unlike so-called G. Generation we coddle out teens until they turn 18 at which point they are magically and instantly supposed to turn into adults.

For this reason the book might feel somewhat dated. I did not expect teens taking on life-and-death situations. Then I recalled my history lessons: they often had to.

One more interesting observation follows. I have seen quite a lot of people say that a science fiction writer has to be a liberal.

After all the science fiction is about the future and it is supposed to be liberal and humanitarian.

Not completely subscribing to this view and not completely rejecting it I just note that Heinlein was a libertarian. He did not hide his views in his fiction, but almost always managed to stop right before he start preaching in earlier works at least ; just read this book as an example.

Being a libertarian had not prevented him from became one of the greatest science fiction classics. So what about the book?

It is good full of adventure and action. I wish I had read it in my teens - this is the best time to read it.

The first book to capture me. It left my 12 year-old mind reeling and set my all-consuming, voracious hunger for sci-fi into motion.

Of course I had "read" other books in school, but Red Planet blew me away. I was transported. Never to return.

Here's the cover that I remember from 55 years ago. Full size image here View all 4 comments. It took me too long to get through this relatively short book, because it drags.

The beginning starts slow, there's a bit of an adventure on Mars that heightens things for a while, but then the book grinds down to a finish with a trial and dithering.

This is one of Heinlein's early works. I believe they were called "juveniles", because they were meant for kids.

This sort of writing and level of excitement might have engaged kids when it was published in , but I can't see kids today enjoy thi It took me too long to get through this relatively short book, because it drags.

This sort of writing and level of excitement might have engaged kids when it was published in , but I can't see kids today enjoy this. Nor can I see women of any age and time being enamored of a book that lumps them all together as "women folk" who are portrayed as useless.

Heinlein also set his language and portrayal of his character in a future world as if they were s Midwesterners.

Now that I've gotten all that out of my system, there are some bright spots. It's cool to see the beginning writer working through his craft and glimmers of what's to occasionally shine through here.

View all 7 comments. Another Heinlein juvenile, another curious blend of work by a virtuoso visionary and his unfortunate co-author the cheating hack.

These guys are subtle and weird and so far beyond earth norms that every interaction with them is fraught and puzzling.

Also, while you can see prototypical versions of many of his stock characters crusty old Dr. MacReady is a strip Another Heinlein juvenile, another curious blend of work by a virtuoso visionary and his unfortunate co-author the cheating hack.

MacReady is a stripped-down and far less annoying Jubal Harshaw , their excesses are restrained by the better sense of the people around them.

THE BAD: All the tension of the heroic stand-off with murderous forces of authority is defused when everyone in the ranks of that authority turn out to be cowards, simpletons, paranoids, and gross incompetents.

Heinlein loved to stack his decks like this, and it does him no more credit here than it did anywhere else.

Also, the treatment of gender is blindingly awful, even for , especially for Heinlein. Boys in Martian society are accounted men when they can carry guns; girls are considered adults when they can cook and help with babies.

You'd think a guy who could write something as mind-bendingly weird as Heinlein's Martians could apply some of that mental plasticity to an examination of the women of his own species.

View 1 comment. Aug 28, M. This is a decent novel that has reasonably survived the test of time, at least as long as you know when this novel was published the 's People used to more modern-day sci fi might find this novel somewhat dated, but you know what, it's still a solid read, especially if you like old-school science fiction.

It also ties in nicely with 'Stranger in a Strange Land' by the same author. The bad science doesn't bother me too much, but I can't get past the sexism and the contrived conflict.

None of the bad guys had any competence? The good guys were automatically superior strategists, warriors, leaders, etc.? I'd give it one star, but the Martians were interesting, and treated with respect.

One of Heinlein's early YA books, it's about 2 young boys who wind up on an adventure on Mars. This is a Mars with water frozen in its canals, oxygen, but not enough for a human to breath unassisted.

So if you like your SF with the latest science in place, this isn't for you. Heinlien's young heroes are boy scouts, good kids with good intentions who buck the odds to do the right thing.

Happy ending! I'm probably wrong about 3d grade, get another opinion. There is a moral to the story; be brave, resourceful and - damn the consequences - do the RIGHT thing.

I've seen worse messages in books, this one is pretty typical of all his YA books. It starts out pretty routine but becomes much better and more adult less than half way through.

The book could definitely be considered a precursor to Stranger In A Strange Land since it has the exact same martians and their culture.

In fact this book describes them much better and I recommend reading it before Stranger if possible. Jul 26, R.

Within the hero-villain adventure story plotline, the author sets these variously explored layers amidst an American Revolution-type frame.

And so, echoes from Adams, Jefferson, and Paine emerge. The author's reliance on the MacRae character to be his aged, curmudgeonly, all-at-once Everyman, doctor, sage, linguist, diplomat, councilor, and combat platoon sergeant , irritates.

His comments about paranoia simply are ignorant and inflammatory, making them "wrong" in both senses of the word.

Despite all , Heinlein still creates an enjoyable tale that engages the reader on both the fun and thinking level.

Section by section, and chapter by chapter, readers will recognize prototypes, ideas, themes, and paradigms that have heavily influenced later science fiction tales and scripts.

A few include: —the government-private company alliance in Alien ; —the atmospheric processing stations in Aliens ; —the character and some functions of R2D2 in Star Wars ; —the "beach ball" alien in Dark Star ; —a feature of the environmental suits in Dune ; —and, the sub-plot, tunnels, and ice-water dynamic in Total Recall.

Lastly, the most wonderful aspects of this fun and thoughtful adventure novel deal with the Martians themselves. For the love of Mike, I enjoyed Red Planet.

Red Planet is a swell novel. If I remember right, it was possibly my second or third Heinlein read, after Tunnel in the Sky, which I found, rather lost and forgotten, at the back of my school library.

It was one of my early favourites. Jim Marlowe is a teenage colonist at boarding school on Mars. Howe and eventually, Mr. The result is a fight between the adults for the independence of Mars and a showdown between the original Martian inhabitants and the human colonists, the result of which seems to depend upon Jim and Willis.

What surprises me most on re-reading is how complex this book really is behind the obvious plot narrative. We have ancient Martian races, social revolution and rather manipulative humans on a Bonestellian style planet.

Our hero is, as was rather traditional for these books, a teenage human male, whose growing up see: rite-of-passage was rather frontier-like.

On the cutting edge of space colonisation, Jim Marlowe is a pioneer. This nearly comes unstuck at one point when Jim seems rather determined to shoot his dictatorial headteacher, but is only stopped by being talked down or rather, wrestled down by his friend Frank.

What is more surprising on this reread is what Heinlein does here with the back-story of the Martian race, which in this edition is more complex than I remembered it.

They are an old and complex race, who can do when the situation requires it , near impossible things. What is more noticeable, reading this now as an adult, is the connection between Willis and the elder Martian race, more Ray Bradbury Martian Chronicles than Burroughs John Carter.

For me, Willis the bouncing Martian is still a memorable favourite. Reading from William H. Because Jim is going away to school, Phyllis argues that she should be allowed to own a gun to look after her younger baby brother.

This replaces a scene in my original version where Jim is berated by his father because he leaves his weapon out where his younger brother wanders.

Further changes are relatively minor. Additional note, later: Many of these changes are mentioned in an article published in by the Heinlein Society, HERE Reading this again, I now see early versions of what will become Heinlein tropes.

The strong-willed hero, determined to do what is right and often against the corporate machine is one, as represented by both Jim and his father who is that typical adult who does the right thing when forced to and here ends up leading the revolt against the corporation.

Another very noticeable difference between Red Planet and Space Cadet, reading the two fairly close together, is that we have here, more than before, the use of strong, opinionated female characters.

Having talked before in my review of Space Cadet about how little females were represented in the book, here, through the character of Phyllis, Jim's younger sister, Heinlein readdresses that issue a little.

This is a less predictable, more complicated novel than Space Cadet, using even stranger ideas, yet still being extremely entertaining.

Gratifyingly, the simplistic and naive book I was rather expecting is, for the most part, much less unsophisticated and more entertaining than I had hoped.

Whilst this is not the Martian environment as we know it today, it still has an attractive allure that makes the reader want to be there.

If only. View 2 comments. This is one of the earlier Heinleins so perhaps the sexism wasn't so obvious back then. However, it is quite blatant.

There is some racism as well. Although I remembered the story fondly, I found on rereading that it is far from being one of his better stories.

About the only positive part was that the character of Willis is really well developed and cute. Not recommended. Trying to decide what to do with the book since it is a first edition but not in great shape.

I might donate to County libra This is one of the earlier Heinleins so perhaps the sexism wasn't so obvious back then. I might donate to County library branch I've been using.

I listened to this as an audio book. Heinlein does toy with his libertarian notions a bit, but not so as to offend my liberal sensibilities.

The aliens are truly alien, and the human I listened to this as an audio book. The aliens are truly alien, and the humans are truly human.

A solid entry in Heinlein's novels, this is one of the ones about and probably written more for youth like Podkayne of Mars , Tunnel in the Sky , and Rocket Ship Galileo.

This one takes place entirely on Mars, and involves a rebellion between some of the human colonists there and the company that runs the place.

Also, a weird Martian ball-animal that can somehow reproduce human voices perfectly a A solid entry in Heinlein's novels, this is one of the ones about and probably written more for youth like Podkayne of Mars , Tunnel in the Sky , and Rocket Ship Galileo.

Also, a weird Martian ball-animal that can somehow reproduce human voices perfectly and acts much like a voice recorder.

Other than the alien aspects, little here is new or unusual in terms of the plot. There's the power-mad schoolmaster, a race to alert the community in time, and some decent fights.

But the aliens are actually pretty neat, the way they are handled, and the standard plot is done well. All of you who have immersed themselves in the Kim Stanley Robinson Red Mars trilogy should invest a little time in reading this one.

Robinson made supreme use of current scientific knowledge in putting together a real hard SF tale about our planetary neighbor.

Now picture someone in Heinlein trying to do the same thing with the limited knowledge available at the time.

The story is a YA tale, with a pair of boys as the protagonists and a cute but mysterious Martian crittur, Willis, as the All of you who have immersed themselves in the Kim Stanley Robinson Red Mars trilogy should invest a little time in reading this one.

In the infinity of mighty, living Being, what you loved more than yourself - your work - will survive. We could not completely conquer time and space.

What is dear to us instead is all that has been accomplished by our united efforts though thousands of centuries: our power over the elements, our understanding of nature, the beauty of life that we have created.

View 1 comment. A major part of the book is like the 19th century "guided tour of the future" utopian fiction. However, there is more plot and characters than those tended to have.

It does have a short-coming similar to the original Star Trek series in which several top crew members are indispensable in doing every kind of task.

For those interested in socialist speculations, this is an important portrait. One interesting point is the importance in this society of maintaining and analyzing data to reallocate resources and optimize the functioning of society.

One point which does not seem to have bothered readers who wanted to believe back when the book first came out: The premise is a well-established socialist society on Mars.

It's explicitly stated in the book that different conditions distinct to Mars resulted in the establishment of a single, worldwide socialist society with less difficulty than was realistic for Earth.

After all the years since Red Star's publication, readers may not find this as insignificant. A significant historical note is that one discussion in the book mentions the possibility that one or a few isolated socialist nations surrounded by hostile capitalist nation might become distorted under the pressures.

Some believe something like this describes what happened to the USSR. Perhaps, some other explanation is needed to explain how later Communist nations followed the same pattern from their birth.

This is one of my favorite books. Written by Alyaksandr Malinouski, more commonly known as Alexander Bogdanov. A work of science fiction about a socialist utopia on Mars.

UK IT book club choice for December. But mercifully short and James did remind me that this book was written around the time of the Russian revolution, so pretty forward thinking.

Red Star is from This novella tells of a utopian civilization on Mars after a revolution. As an article of science fiction, it has some pretty accurate predictions and the influence is clearly felt in other early utopian SF and the works of Ursula K LeGUin.

As a novel, it was slow, but as a creative Red Star is from As a novel, it was slow, but as a creative product of historical ideology: 5 stars.

Another Mars utopia. It misses the milestone of true visual revolutionary art with too many lengthy scenes of the bloody bourgeois having diner parties!

As some insight into historical ideology, Red Star is great I guess. But as a novel, not good. I skipped through and just found what I needed for my homework View 2 comments.

When it comes to genres, you can't get much more niche than pre-Soviet, Bolshevik science fiction. Think War of the Worlds, only written with all the technical and political bluntness only a Russian revolutionary could muster.

And without all the action that would translate into a panic-inducing radio drama. If that sounds like I'm trying to say the book is not very well-written, you would be correct.

It really isn't. This is the golden era of Lowell's canals, or Burrough's "princess of mars. Modern authors still pay tribute to these early pioneers, and "Red Star" is no different.

Like his real-world counterpart, Alexy is Russian, a scientist, and not fond of traditional societies. The plot of Red Star is fairly straightforward--a revolutionary intellectual, through a series of events is whisked away to a Martian society that has already eliminated class struggle.

This utopia serves as a way for Bogdanov to critique the actual events of earth in his time, including divisions within the early Bolshevik movement itself.

Like any utopia, it is somewhat too good to be true, but to his credit Bogdanov tries to stress that even this alien worker's paradise has its issues.

There is a darkly ominous episode in which, to his horror, the protagonist discovers that these enlightened beings once contemplated annihilating all life on earth, a War of the Worlds that never happened, or was at least deferred.

There are some other interesting ideas that Bogdanov plays with, and which were considered pretty radical even for a revolutionary at the time.

The Martians of his book live a largely gender-neutral lifestyle in terms of clothing and behavior. While they are definitely divided into men and women, the difference between them is so negligible at least to an earthling that the protagonist struggles with his attraction to a character who he initially assumed to be male.

The queer literary interpretations here are quite interesting. In terms of relationships, the Martians appear to be polyamorous, although they tend to bond emotionally with one person at a time.

Blood transfusions, Bogdanov's own pet scientific area of research, even makes an appearance. This still relatively dangerous and new procedure is used by the Martians as a way to invigorate one another in the form of total transfusions, a kind of blood-swapping, medical version of comradely union.

Bogdanov himself ended up dying from this, in a bold self-led experiment which again was very emblematic of this time period. Overall, the book is very optimistic about the future, like a lot of pre-WWI literature.

And like a lot of that literature, this optimism hasn't aged terribly well, given what the rest of the twentieth century ended up being like, especially in Russia itself, where the long-awaited revolution devolved into terror and corruption.

Still, you feel for Bogdanov and the yearning he had for a better world, so much that you start to hope yourself. Like one of the Martians tells the protagonist, as they admire a statue of a child in a Martian museum: "This is you," he said, pointing at the boy.

It will be a marvelous world, but it is still in its infancy. Look at the hazy dreams and disturbing images troubling his mind. He is still half asleep, but some day he will awaken.

I feel it, I sincerely believe in it! A remarkable book indeed, in the version I read, Red Star is paired with its sequel Engineer Menni and a poem which was to form the basis for a threequel before the authors death.

It's hard to pin down what's great about this book, the wider context of it - written by a genuine Russian revolutionary, almost certainly read by both Lenin who is mentioned in the book and Stalin - makes some of the science fiction elements almost seem pre-cognitive, such as when the Martian socialists A remarkable book indeed, in the version I read, Red Star is paired with its sequel Engineer Menni and a poem which was to form the basis for a threequel before the authors death.

It's hard to pin down what's great about this book, the wider context of it - written by a genuine Russian revolutionary, almost certainly read by both Lenin who is mentioned in the book and Stalin - makes some of the science fiction elements almost seem pre-cognitive, such as when the Martian socialists discuss that 'socialism with human characteristics', to steal a Chinese styling, will inevitably be different, violent and militarist, compared to the Martian socialism, due to the historical and political context of Earth and people.

It also contains some quiet awareness of the limits of Marxism, with both Marx's limitations alluded to while Mar's Marx - Xarma - is explicitly noted as not creating a complete system for the new world of socialist Mars - later ideological labour was yet needed.

The books themselves are first a trip to Mars and exploration of Martian society and the effect of living in such a radically different society on even the most 'near' human, a Russian socialist revolutionary followed by a 'translated historical work' from Mars, which charts the evolution of Mars through the last three stages of society in Marxist terms feudalism, capitalism, socialism via Martian personalities - Duke Alto - exemplar of aristocratic strength, his son Menni the engineer, exemplar of scientific rationalism and Netti, his grandson, exemplar of socialist unity.

The sensation of helplessness sometimes felt in the text - Menni and Netti love and admire one another, but are fated by dialectical materialism to clash due to their ideological incompatibility - perhaps serves as a kind of venting against the way such 'social and historical forces' deny individual human agency with the same strength as ancient belief in destiny and fate.

When one learns more of the author Bogdanov, it seems very much to me that this book exists as an externalising of the inevitable struggles within those fighting for utopias - and a deep awareness of how some problems are simply bigger than ideology - socialist paradise Mars struggles with overpopulation and environmental decline.

Bogdanov seems very much to be present in the character of Menni the Engineer, who revolutionised Mars via the building of the canals but was unable to imagine how he could live in the following worker's paradise; in reality he lived to see the beginnings of Stalinism's paranoid purges, being arrested by the GPU KGB forerunner and died transfusing malaria-poisoned blood into himself as part of his studies to increase the health of all, in what some suspect was a 'useful suicide' - eerily echoing Menni, who resists his destiny of class struggle against his child by committing suicide.

All told, a remarkable work both of early 20th century science fiction - with atomic power one of many unexpected appearances - and a fantastic example of how sci-fi can both explore the future and expose the present, even when that present is something as complex as the Russian revolutionary underground as it powers up for the final struggle.

Despite its name being 'the First Bolshevik Utopia' its not at all about a utopia. The jist of the story is that a Russian man on the onset of more wide spread communism is whisked away to Mars, which is a fully communist society.

I'd like to focus on Mar's society and how it works. What would it really mean to have a full communist world where working is done by choice and individual ownership isn't a thing?

Our protagonist first notes that all the martians look kinda alike. This makes sense. F Despite its name being 'the First Bolshevik Utopia' its not at all about a utopia.

Fashion is a expression individuality so why wouldn't all clothes look alike? Even all hair cuts being the same.

With work being non-compulsory its actually surprising how much civilization chooses to work. Though if the society was brought up this way it stands to reason it could happen By communist society I also mean communist planet.

All of Mars is globally once society with 1 language and a shared goal since in communism their is no leadership or high command.

This is explained that with not as much livable land their wasn't a case of the martian people spreading out. With the low gravity its easy to just run everywhere rather then requiring a dedicated mode of travel pre-industrilization and so Earth's case of having many different conflicting and warring societies didn't happen Our protagonist deciding to join in with the martian workforce discovers something that would be a clear indication on why none of this would ever work on earth: He found the work he was doing rather boring.

How can you expect the population to work 'just cuzz' when its boring? This is all hand-waved away as 'The Martians are far more disciplined then us earthlings".

The story does show an interesting take on a none capitalist system You could argue our own world is barely functioning, but at least its far easier to understand our economic and societal problems and not "yea people love working.

I consider it penance for the urban fantasy novels that I usually read. This book has all the poetry and drama that one expects with a Marxist tract.

Before going into my criticism, I would add that this was listed along with WE as examples of early Soviet science fiction, except that WE is readable.

Even as Marxist theory, it is poorly written. I would recommend contemporaries of the author such as Luxemburg or K I got this book for free through Early Bird Books, and I regret the money I spent.

My familiarity is based on writing and teaching about Marxism and revolutionary theory. In reality, this is two books. Once there, he finds the socialist ideal for which he has been fighting.

So the majority of the book is long tracts discussing the merits of the socialist system. Unfortunately, like most socialist discussions it requires a suspension of belief and ignoring scientific and sociological facts.

Since Bogdanov uses the same names for the characters, it is difficult to separate the two narratives. This brings me to a significant problem with both of these novels.

There is so much emphasis on political theory that there is no effort to give the characters any dimension.

I consider this a failure of the author and not the subject since other revolutionaries, Gorky, wrote novels that were worth reading.

Without any reason for the reader to invest themselves, the books read like the worst of political theory. I skimmed through most of the second part, it didn't interest me as much as the first one.

I was a little scared I'd get lost with references from a book born a few years prior to the Bolshevik revolution, but the simplicity of it really surprised me.

I wonder if Bogdanov meant to write a book in which his ideas would be conveyed in a timeless and universal fashion - perhaps that was his goal.

Red Star was my first contact with socialist utopia so it really felt fresh to me. I couldn't get enough I skimmed through most of the second part, it didn't interest me as much as the first one.

I couldn't get enough of the pages and pages dedicated to explain Mars' state and culture! I actually think he could've explored more that world, so the ending left me a little unsatisfied.

A futuristic sequel focused on Mars and Earth diplomacy would've been great as well. Another surprising point to me was the whole issue with sexuality and gender - I couldn't believe my eyes when view spoiler [Netti was revealed to be a woman.

Not only Bogdanov gifted us with a character at first attracted to what he thought was a man, but his treatment towards female characters showed how his ideology played in terms of gender equality.

It's amazing in some ways to think this was written over a century ago: Bogdanov talks about live streaming 3D media, and other such things.

On the other hand, it's definitely a child of its time: written before the Russian revolution of , it's a political polemic about a utopian communist society, heavily laden with rhetoric, propaganda, and worthy discourse.

However, unlike many similar books, it's very readable. Bogdanov's use of science makes this stand out from typical turn of the centu It's amazing in some ways to think this was written over a century ago: Bogdanov talks about live streaming 3D media, and other such things.

Bogdanov's use of science makes this stand out from typical turn of the century sci-fi, and his characters are genuinely interesting, flawed people.

It's slightly odd to find things like his obsession with production statistics, but this actually helped me realize how important this was to the growth of the USSR from a poor agrarian feudal economy to an industrial powerhouse in the space of little more than generation.

It's definitely not for everyone, but it's the sort of curio I enjoy discovering. Full of dated revolutionist logic, however very interesting to consider within context of being written within an intoxication of Russian revolution fervour.

Said of their oppressors: "Theirs is the logic of dead men. They want peace and immobility, they want life around them to come to a standstill.

What has happened to them constantly happens to people and to entire classes, to ideas and to institutions: they have quite simply died and become vampires This book had two stories and a poem.

I am fascinated by the idea of Mars having water canals at one point. The stories forwards had a lot of vital and interesting information.

Interesting as a sample of an era, but ultimately flawed as a book. The ideas might be worth exploring; however, the narrative is poor, with serious pacing issues, and could use a fair bit of Chekov's gun.

I wanted to read Red Star because it was name-dropped in Post-Capitalism and since I got into watching Andrei Tarkovsky I've had a fascination with Soviet sci-fi as an "other side" to science fictions "golden age" which was not that golden, but that's another story.

And since it was short and my campus library had it, I thought I'd check out this, one of the earliest examples of Soviet sci-fi.

Unfortunately for its star rating, this book also contains his novella Engineer Menni , and honestly m I wanted to read Red Star because it was name-dropped in Post-Capitalism and since I got into watching Andrei Tarkovsky I've had a fascination with Soviet sci-fi as an "other side" to science fictions "golden age" which was not that golden, but that's another story.

Unfortunately for its star rating, this book also contains his novella Engineer Menni , and honestly much of this review is going to be about the two books' politics rather than their quality.

Paul Mason talked about this book in reference to its use of mass automation, central computers to calculate work in necessary labor hours rather than money, and all its progressive, utopian elements, like the lack of need for contractual marriage when nobody has property and children are raised communally.

What he failed to mention is that Bogdanov is, in may ways, highly conservative. He clearly doesn't like modern art or poetry, is horrified by the idea of birth control, and still has his female Martians dress more modestly than the men.

Plus, once you get to Red Star 's prequel Engineer Menni he still can't resist the urge to have the entire plot center on Great Men -- emphasis on men, as women only exist to be emotional support and muses in the story.

So much for collectivism over individualism; that only applies when it comes to painting, I guess. I'll talk about the difference in story quality between the two novellas at the end here.

What's more troubling, though, is how some of the story foreshadows problems the Soviet Union would actually have. Bogdanov's optimistic vision of total reconstructing of water masses on Mars to fuel more agriculture is horrifying when you know the story of the Aral Sea.

That Sterni's argument that humanity isn't civilized enough and should be wiped out is met with only "no, we can assimilate them" as an alternative sure goes a long way to explaining the treatment of Siberian peoples under the Soviet Union.

It is really telling that his best case scenario for socialism developing necessitates a monoculture with no linguistic or cultural diversity.

Yay progressivism! To be completely fair to Bogdanov, though, he doesn't really consider his Mars a utopia; it has problems, and indeed one of his arguments for Marxism seems to be that the cessation of class struggle is necessary to free up humanity for our real struggle, against Nature.

But even that puts him as a man of his time, seeing Nature as an Other to be conquered rather than something we're part of and have to learn to coexist in.

Mason may whimsically wonder what the Soviet Union would have been like if Bogdanov had been its ideological leader rather than Lenin - would it have stopped Stalin?

They were both still products of an early 20th century mindset that didn't have more contemporary ideas like cultural pluralism and environmentalism.

And that ultimately is the challenge of any revolution - you can't just expect one big social transformation to fix everything when there are things you, as a limited product of your time, aren't even aware need changing yet.

Social change has to be ongoing, has to allow for multiple perspectives and criticism to keep fixing itself. If there is any indication that Bogdanov might have been better than Lenin at achieving this, its his allowance of differing opinions on Mars - and yet who knows how it would have played out if it came down to his views being the ones challenged?

Who knows. Anyway, as a historical resource this book is good, and Red Star is even entertaining as sci-fi yarn, with Lenni's emotional journey actually being a pretty well-written one.

Prequels are almost always a step down, and I honestly can't recommend it even for its historical insights.

The characters are flatter, the world-building is poorer, and the plot is rather absurd, with Netti being such a Gary Stu stand-in for Bogdanov that it's kind of laughable.

Quit after the first novella and just read the commentary at the end for insights into Bogdanov's philosophy. I was a bit reluctant to read this book at first.

I expected a quite dry, moralist description of some ideal communist state. But the book still managed to, kind of, surprise me.

The idea of Martians that have developed some kind of Marxist state on Mars is almost childishly charming. Among detailed - and, as expected - dry descriptions of factories and semi-scientific ways to prolong life Bogdanov died while experimenting with blood transfusions, in an attempt to find a way to achieve eternal I was a bit reluctant to read this book at first.

The dramatic events towards the end of the novel are written down in a not quite dramatic style; a style that doesn't really highlight the concerned events.

Red Star is surprisingly well-written for being written in Russia, during Communism, with specific rules from the government on what was okay to write and what wasn't.

It is an actual story about a Communist man who is taken to Mars to observe a perfect Communist society in action. He falls in love with one of the Martians, but his intelligence makes him fragile and he goes into a mad rage.

This book pains humans, and specifically men, as depressingly and inherently violent. Yet it still maintain Red Star is surprisingly well-written for being written in Russia, during Communism, with specific rules from the government on what was okay to write and what wasn't.

Yet it still maintains a quality that makes it fairly easy to read. I enjoyed it. View all 3 comments. I'm not much on reading short story collections; so, that was a pleasant plus from the get go.

Menni was the best of the lot. Both stories, not too surprisingly, were propaganda laden. What seemed novel and new then seems odd and dated now.

There was just enough story and intrigue to keep things moving. When all is said and done,this book ekes out 5 stars on uniqueness alone.

der rote planet

4 Gedanken zu “Der rote planet”

  1. Nach meiner Meinung lassen Sie den Fehler zu. Es ich kann beweisen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden reden.

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *